Lately on various left-leaning media outlets, there have been headlines of articles condemning Trump, such as his conviction as a felon, his age, his religion, and possibly everything else about Trump. They seem to be condemning Trump for a specific reason, and it is most likely the bottom line, since most mainstream media outlets are at some level government funded. And if they were not government funded, how come some media outlets are in the red margin? Take this headline from Newsweek: Donald Trump Gets No Black Votes vs. Kamala Harris in New Michigan Poll. This article was found on MSN, and conveniently, comments were turned off, but on Dauntless Corsair, you can scroll down and comment as much as you like, but anyways, the support for Trump among blacks nationwide is tremendous, and Trump does speak highly of black people. Look no further than the Bronx in New York. Also, Newsweek has a very poor financial past, like back in April 2013, where the IAC chairman said at the Milken Global Conference that he wish he had not bought Newsweek, or in 2010 after the financial crisis when everyone was recovering again, Newsweek was still left in the dust. Only when the Pandemic hit did they start to get back up, from 7 million monthly readers to a supposed 100 million readers, which resulted in the company having 75 million in revenues. But we do not really know their expenses, so we do not know if they are profitable or not, which is important. So ask yourself and other this question; if a news outlet with a poor financial past is supposedly writing for the government's purpose, do you think that they are manipulating you to vote for their candidate, so you live under their agenda, and do what they want you to do for a period of time? They'll probably fact-check this article now.